This was what prompted me to put together the blog. Work had been done on the new Civil Procedural Code of the province and wanted to share, but could not find how. Alejandro, a computer friend, directed me to the blog. In fact, he has long suggests to me that one arm, just pointing to my side of story-teller, not the lawyer. But anyway, here I am, take the opportunity to raise other legal work, for now, the Book of Fees and Preliminary Hearing monograph I wrote a few years ago. Promise to post my part of the judicial management manual (but only when the roll runs out, in that I respect the publisher and co-authors), I also agree to go up chapters of the work on forensic style, something that I write slowly. In short, as the job is not all, will listen to my friend and I'll upload some stories in the back room blog.
Clarification of the work based on the CPC
I started this job for me, in order to begin to grasp the reform. Then came the possibility to publish it, what made me change the format. Finally the paper publication was unsuccessful, which, as I say, has led me to publish it in this way. However, the electronic version has one advantage: the Code has been amended twice, imagine that there are other reforms and I suppose that this process of accommodation can lead a good time. The advantage is, then, flexibility, because it is relatively easy to begin getting the file as reforms succeed-which, yes, I agree to do.
As I said in the Introduction, this work has no greater pretensions. Has over traditional than legal, it does not include opinions on reform. It is a new text comparison with the previous, which, of course, requires a prior agreement between the numbers of items. I also included a series of footnotes to the page. The notes have a different purpose: to highlight an important aspect of reform, noted that an article has no counterpart in the previous Code or has been removed from the new article explaining that a move to such a place, etc. Then, the reader will find: 1) matches numeric, 2) comparison between new and old text (which similarities and differences are marked typographically), 3) the notes.
work The advantage is that it has two codes. Their disadvantages, which is long and the overlap of the two bodies sometimes complicated reading. Believe, therefore, its usefulness is limited: 1) To begin, I would not recommend students Litigation. They will draw more out of a clean version of the new Code. 2) However, I guess it will be useful for the rest: those who already know the old code and have been forced to take it as a starting point. However, I also believe that the utility will be limited to the early days, the period of adaptation to the new Code.
Instructions for downloading the file
must click the link below. Be patient, the file takes some time to load. It is in PDF, so I open Acrobat directly. I guess if you do not have Acrobat on their computers, will be given the option to download the program. Already in the file, they should keep a copy on their computers (command "File"> "Save as "). Then see if it's worth printing.
Well, that, I hope they serve ... Oh, one last thing: the work is under construction, so comments and suggestions are welcome.
LOWER CPC Clarification of the work based on the CPC
I started this job for me, in order to begin to grasp the reform. Then came the possibility to publish it, what made me change the format. Finally the paper publication was unsuccessful, which, as I say, has led me to publish it in this way. However, the electronic version has one advantage: the Code has been amended twice, imagine that there are other reforms and I suppose that this process of accommodation can lead a good time. The advantage is, then, flexibility, because it is relatively easy to begin getting the file as reforms succeed-which, yes, I agree to do.
As I said in the Introduction, this work has no greater pretensions. Has over traditional than legal, it does not include opinions on reform. It is a new text comparison with the previous, which, of course, requires a prior agreement between the numbers of items. I also included a series of footnotes to the page. The notes have a different purpose: to highlight an important aspect of reform, noted that an article has no counterpart in the previous Code or has been removed from the new article explaining that a move to such a place, etc. Then, the reader will find: 1) matches numeric, 2) comparison between new and old text (which similarities and differences are marked typographically), 3) the notes.
work The advantage is that it has two codes. Their disadvantages, which is long and the overlap of the two bodies sometimes complicated reading. Believe, therefore, its usefulness is limited: 1) To begin, I would not recommend students Litigation. They will draw more out of a clean version of the new Code. 2) However, I guess it will be useful for the rest: those who already know the old code and have been forced to take it as a starting point. However, I also believe that the utility will be limited to the early days, the period of adaptation to the new Code.
Instructions for downloading the file
must click the link below. Be patient, the file takes some time to load. It is in PDF, so I open Acrobat directly. I guess if you do not have Acrobat on their computers, will be given the option to download the program. Already in the file, they should keep a copy on their computers (command "File"> "Save as "). Then see if it's worth printing.
Well, that, I hope they serve ... Oh, one last thing: the work is under construction, so comments and suggestions are welcome.
0 comments:
Post a Comment